In haar email van 30 mei 2012 had c

In haar email van 30 mei 2012 had concluante aan de notaris reeds meegedeeld dat er een bedrag van 20.500,00 € was betaald met de vraag om het bedrag (doelend op 80.000,00 € minus die 20.500,00 €) ad 59.500,00 € aan te passen). Later gaf de notaris dan toe dat ze daar eigenlijk niet toe was overgegaan, verwijzend naar haar drukke activiteiten. Dus een notariële vergetelheid, dewelke concluante duur kwam te staan.

結果 (英語) 1:

In her email of 30 may 2012 had already reported that the notary concluante to an amount of 20,500, 00 € was paid with the question to the amount (denoting 80,000, 00 € minus that 20,500, 00 €) to adjust ad 59.500, 00 €). The notary then later gave them there actually not matter was passed, referring to her busy activities. So a notarized oblivion, which came to be concluante duration.

結果 (英語) 2:

In her email of May 30, 2012 had concluante the notary already informed that there was an amount of € 20,500.00 paid to the demand for the amount (meaning minus € 80,000.00 to € 20,500.00), totaling € 59,500.00 to adjust). Later on, the notary then that she was not actually there to proceed, referring to her busy schedule. So a notarized oblivion, which came to be concluante expensive.

結果 (英語) 3:

In its email of may 30, 2012 concluante had already notified to the notary that an amount of EUR 20,500.00 was paid to the question of the amount (envisaging 80,000.00 € 20,500.00 minus that $) ad 59,500.00 € to adapt). Later, the notary public than that they actually did not, referring to its busy activities. Therefore a notarial oblivion,Which concluante duration came to be.