Het woordje “again” (vert.:“wéér”)

Het woordje “again” (vert.:“wéér”) slaat duidelijk op de herhaling en bewijst dat de discussie omtrent de opleg van 80.000,00 € nooit werd afgerond, doch nog wél actueel is!
En het is dan ook in de haast bij de ondertekening van de akte, zoals trouwens ook bevestigd zowel door notaris als verweerder op hoofdeis, dat véél misgelopen is.
Essentieel is dan ook, en de het zal de rechtbank behagen om daar nota van te nemen, dat beide partijen nadrukkelijk het bestaan én de verschuldigdheid van de opleg (hoewel die door “de omstandigheden” niet opgenomen werd in de E.O.T. akte) erkennen!
De vordering van concluante is hoe dan ook terecht en verschuldigd

結果 (英語) 1:

The word "again" (TRANS.: "again") stores clear on the repetition and proves that the discussion on the weekend from Thursday afternoon up to 80,000, 00 € was never completed, but still is up to date!And it is in the rush at the signature of the notary Act, as confirmed by both defendant on key demand, that much is lost.Is essential, and it will please the Court to take note of, that both parties the existence and the chargeability of the lay-on (although those by "the circumstances" was not included in the e.o.t. akte) recognize!The advancement of concluante is right and due

結果 (英語) 2:

The word "again" (trans:. "Mathews") clearly refers to the repetition and proves that the discussion on the support of € 80,000.00 was never completed, but is still relevant!
And it is also in hurry the signing of the deed, as indeed confirmed by both notary as a defendant in principal claim that much has gone wrong.
It is essential, therefore, and it will please the court to take note of it, both parties explicitly the existence and the chargeability of the support (though by "circumstances" was not included in the deed EOT) recognized this
claim of concluante is anyway justified and due

結果 (英語) 3:

The word "again" (vert. : "niche") stores clearly on the repetition and proves that the discussion about the last minute of 80,000.00 € was never completed, but still has a current is!
And it is in such a hurry at the time of the signing of the act, as also confirmed by both notary as defendant insist, that much is lost.
is essential,And the the court will please to note the fact that the parties expressly the existence and the chargeability of the last minute (although it by "the circumstances" was not included in the E. O.T. act) recognize!
The claim of concluante is how rightly and payable