Eiseres beweert dat er een opleg va

Eiseres beweert dat er een opleg van 80,000 Euros zou zijn overeengekomen doch brengt daarvan geen enkel bewijs bij.

Eiseres verwijst allen naar haar stuk 1, een niet gedateerde nota.

Howel concluant aanvankelijk dacht dat deze nota van de hand van eiseres zelf was, lijkt stuk A van eiseres aan te tonen dat de nota op de voorafgaande bespreking van 26 maart 2012 werd opgesteld door de notaris.

結果 (英語) 1:

Plaintiff claims that there is a lay-on by 80,000 Euros would be agreed but brings no evidence thereof.Plaintiff refers all to her piece 1, an undated note.Howel concluant initially thought this note from the hand of the claimant himself was A plaintiff's piece, seems to show that the note on the prior discussion of 26 March 2012 has been prepared by the notary.

結果 (英語) 2:

Plaintiff claims that there is a surcharge of 80,000 Euros would have been agreed but brings them no proof at. Plaintiff refers to all hair piece 1, an undated note. Howel concluant initially thought that this note was written by the plaintiff himself, seems broken A plaintiff to show that the note on the previous discussion on March 26, 2012 was prepared by the notary.

結果 (英語) 3:

The applicant claims that there would be a last minute of 80.000 Euros agreed but brings no evidence thereof.

The appellant refers to all its piece 1, an undated note.

Although concluant initially thought that this letter of the hand of the appellant itself was, seems A piece of the applicant to show that the note on the prior examination of March 26, 2012 was drawn up by a notary.