Zoals hij stelt in zijn besluiten, meent hij te moeten opwerpen dat het stuk van de hand van concluante zou zijn en is er geen enkel bewijs als zou dat ten berde gebracht geweest door de notaris.
As he States in his decisions to raise, he believed that would be the piece from the hand of concluante and there is no evidence that would have been raised as by the notary.
As he states in his decision, he believes he must raise that would be the play of the hand of concluante and there is no evidence as it would have been brought into the raised by the notary.
As he says in his decisions, he considers to have to be raised that the piece of the basis of concluante would be and there is no proof as it would have been mentioned by the notary.