Tevens waarom verweerder dat bedrag

Tevens waarom verweerder dat bedrag betaalde en in latere correspondentie alsnog zelf een basisbedrag van 80.000,00 EUR hanteert en eigenlijk toegeeft dat hij dus eenzijdig daar deducties van deed om tot dat kwestieuze bedrag van 20.500,00 EUR te komen…
Als verweerder de opleg van 80.000,00 EUR in deze procedure ontkent dan zal hij wel willen nadrukkelijk stellen waarom hij in de latere correspondentie na de ondertekening van de akte verder blijft ingaan op het verloop van de discussie van de opleg?!

結果 (英語) 1:

Also why defendant that amount paid and in later correspondence itself uses a basic amount of EUR 80 000, 00 and actually admits he's so one-sided there deductions of did to to that questionable amount of 20,500, 00 EUR to come ...As defendant the lay-on by 80,000, 00 EUR in this procedure denies he will sure like to emphasise why he in the later correspondence after the signing of the Act continue to comment on the course of the discussion of the lay-on?!

結果 (英語) 2:

Also why defendant maintains that amount paid and in subsequent correspondence still own a basic amount of € 80,000.00 and actually admits that he did so unilaterally because of deductions to arrive at the contested amount of € 20,500.00 ...
As defendant the support of 80,000 , 00 EUR in this procedure denies he will like to emphatically state why he in later correspondence after the signing of the deed continues to go on the course of the discussion of the support ?!

結果 (英語) 3:

Also why the defendant that amount paid and in subsequent correspondence yourself a basic amount of 80,000.00 EUR uses and actually admits that he did so unilaterally since deducties of questionable amount of 20,500.00 to that reach EUR ...
as defendant the last minute of 80,000,00 EUR in this procedure denies he will want to make it very clear why he in the subsequent correspondence after the signing of the act continues to address the conduct of the discussion of the last minute?!