De missing lallet is gevonden.Zou j

De missing lallet is gevonden.Zou jij s.v.p. voor mij naar het onderstaande willen kijken?


Bij nader onderzoek blijken de producten niet beschadigd, maar alleen enkele omdozen.

Geizen het bovenstaande wil ik de claim eigenlijk, maar ik wil DHL toch wel aansprakelijk stellen voor:
1. Het beschadigen van de zending (omdozen) waardoor de klant zijn producten niet op tijd heeft gekregen.
2. De transport kosten die met deze zending zijn gemoeid.
3. De kosten voor het bestellen en transporten van niuewe omdozen vanuit de fabriek naar ons.
4. De arbeidstijd die met dit alles is gemoeid.

Ik zou graag jouw advies willen hierover, kan ik de huidige claim omzetten?

結果 (英語) 1:

The missing lallet is found. Would you want to look to the following s.v.p. for me?Upon closer examination, it appears that the products are not damaged, but only some outer cases.Geizen the above I would like to claim actually, but I want DHL be liable for:1. Damaging the shipment (boxes I) whereby the customer are products not on time.2. the transport costs associated with that shipment.3. the costs for ordering and shipments of new corrugated cases from the factory to us.4. Working time that with all this.I would like your advice on this, can I convert the current claim?

結果 (英語) 2:

The missing lallet is you please gevonden.Zou for me to look at the following? On closer examination, the products do not appear damaged, but only a few cartons. Geizen the above, I would claim, actually, but I like DHL nevertheless liable for: 1. The damage of the consignment (outer cases) allowing the customer products are not received on time. 2. The transport costs involved in this mission. 3. The costs of delivering and transporting cartons New arrivals from the factory to us. 4. The staff time spent with all of this. I would like this, can I convert the current claim your recommendation?

結果 (英語) 3:

the missing lallet is found for me. would you please go to the following to see?


to further study the products not damaged, but only a few omdozen.

i'd seen it above the claim, but i would still be liable for dhl:
1. the damage of the consignment (omdozen) which the customer products on time.
2.the transportation costs associated with this consignment.
3. the cost for ordering and transportation of niuewe omdozen from the factory to us.
4. the working time is involved with all this.

i would like your opinion to this, can i convert the current claim?