Alleen uit voorgaande blijkt duidel

Alleen uit voorgaande blijkt duidelijk dat er dus voorafgaand een discussie was over 80.000,00 EUR en dat verweerder trouwens zichzelf verspreekt wanneer hij stelt dat alles in een notariële akte werd gezet om dit soort van zaken te vermijden.
Als hij daar dan nog de vermelding maakt dat hij 35.000,00 EUR terugbetaald zou hebben, implicerend dus dat hij beseft dat hij inderdaad veel meer moest terugbetalen, doch dit nooit gedaan heeft en ook geen enkel bewijs daarvan aanbrengt.

結果 (英語) 1:

Only from previous shows that there was a discussion about 80,000 so prior, 00 EUR and that defendant besides slips himself when he says that everything was put in a notarial deed to avoid this kind of business.If he makes the entry that he would have refunded EUR 35,000.00, implying so that he realizes that he had to pay back much more indeed, but this has never been done and also no evidence thereof make.

結果 (英語) 2:

Only from previous shows clearly that there was so prior discussion about € 80,000.00 and that the defendant indeed fresh preaches himself when he says that everything in a notarial deed was put to avoid this kind of things.
If he still makes the entry that he should pay € 35,000.00, thus implying that he realizes that he actually had to pay a lot more, but this has never been done and make no proof thereof.

結果 (英語) 3:

Only from the above it is clear that there was a discussion about 80,000.00 EUR prior and that the defendant itself, moreover, any case when he says that everything in a notarial act was set to avoid this kind of affairs.
If he still makes the statement that he would have repaid EUR 35,000.00,Meaning so that he realizes that he is indeed much more had to repay, but this has never been done and also make no proof thereof.