Het is verhullende bullshit. Ten ee

Het is verhullende bullshit. Ten eerste omdat het fenomeen van hogere schooladviezen voor kinderen van hoogopgeleide ouders veel ouder is dan het afzwakken van de Cito-toets. Belangrijker is onderzoek waar de Inspectie wel naar verwijst maar dat in de commentaren nauwelijks een rol heeft gespeeld, namelijk dat latere selectie kinderen uit laagopgeleide gezinnen de beste kansen biedt om achterstanden in te halen. Hoe later het moment van selectie en hoe beter het onderwijs erin slaagt de verschillen in ouderbetrokkenheid te neutraliseren, hoe meritocratischer het onderwijsbestel. Op beide dimensies scoort Nederland slecht: vroege selectie en korte onderwijsdagen waardoor huiswerkbegeleiding en remedial teaching buiten de school worden aangeboden en dus afhankelijk zijn van ouderlijke middelen. Dat het anders kan leren landen als Zweden, Finland en Denemarken.
In Nederland bestaat er nauwelijks een groter politiek taboe dan de middenschool. Het mocht eens ten koste gaan van de eigen klassenpositie.

結果 (英語) 1:

It's revealing bullshit. First, because the phenomenon of higher school children from highly educated parents advice is much older than the toning down of the Cito key. More important is research where the inspection refers to but that in the comments hardly played a part, namely that subsequent selection children from low-educated families the best opportunities to catch up. The later the time of selection and the better education manages to neutralize the differences in parent involvement, how meritocratischer the educational system. Netherlands scores poorly on both dimensions: early tracking and short education days making homework guidance and remedial teaching outside school are offered and so depend on parental resources. That the different countries like Sweden, Finland and Denmark can learn.In Netherlands, there is hardly a larger political taboo than the comprehensive school. It was even at the expense of own class position.

結果 (英語) 2:

It is concealing bullshit. First, because the phenomenon of college advice for children of highly educated parents is much older than the weakening of the Cito test. More importantly, research what the Inspectorate does refer to but that hardly played a role in the comments, that subsequent selection of children from poorly educated families offers the best opportunities to overtake arrears. The later the time of selection and better education manages to neutralize the differences in parental involvement, how meritocratischer the education system. On both dimensions Netherlands scores badly: early selection and short educational days which are offered homework assistance and remedial teaching outside the school and therefore are subject to parental means. It can teach other countries such as Sweden, Finland and Denmark.
In the Netherlands there is hardly a greater political taboo than the middle. It might even be at the expense of their own class position.

結果 (英語) 3:

it is revealing bullshit. first, because the phenomenon of higher schooladviezen for children of highly educated parents is much older than the weakening of the sats. important research where the inspection is refers in the comments, but hardly played a role, namely that subsequent selection of less educated families children the best opportunity to get up. the later time of selection and the better education manages to neutralize the differences in ouderbetrokkenheid, how meritocratischer education. the bad: scores on both dimensions and early selection and short onderwijsdagen homeroom and remedial teaching outside the school offered and so on parental resources. it can learn different countries like sweden, finland and denmark.in the netherlands there is barely bigger than the middle school political taboo. it was even at the expense of their own klassenpositie.