De heer Beernaert heeft zich dan op

De heer Beernaert heeft zich dan op een onuitstaanbare manier laten kennen door na 29 mei 2012 nooit het bedrag van “80.000,00 €” te vermelden doch wel de “term”te gebruiken van “het volledig bedrag”. Zowel concluante als de notaris werden daardoor valselijk in de luren gelegd! Enerzijds geloofde concluante dat daarbij de 80.000,00 € bedoeld werd anderzijds de notaris dat het door de heer Beernaert gebruikte “volledig bedrag” doelde op wat partijen overeen waren gekomen (alhoewel dat er na de samenkomst van 29 mei 2012 géén enkele relevante dialoog noch onderhandeling was geweest tussen partijen).

結果 (英語) 1:

Mr. Babu has let know by then on a intolerable way after 29 may 2012 never the amount of "80,000, 00 €" to mention but to use the "term" of "the full amount". Both were thereby falsely as the notary in the concluante taken! On the other hand believed concluante leaving the 80,000, 00 €, on the other hand, the notary that it was referred to by Mr Babu used "full amount" was referring to what parties agreed (although that there after the meeting of 29 may 2012 had been no relevant dialogue nor negotiation between parties).

結果 (英語) 2:

Mr. Beernaert has then let you know in an insufferable way through after May 29, 2012 never the amount of "€ 80,000.00" to mention but to be the "term" using "the full amount." Both concluante as solicitor were thereby falsely tricked! Firstly believed concluante leaving the € 80,000.00 was meant secondly notary that used by Mr. Beernaert "full amount" referring to what the parties had agreed (although that after the meeting of May 29, 2012 not a single relevant dialogue or negotiation had been between parties).

結果 (英語) 3:

Mr Beernaert has than on an intolerable way by after May 29, 2012 never know the amount of "80,000.00 $" to mention but the "term" to use "the full amount". If the notary were thus Both concluante falsely to be fooled! One concluante believed that 80,000,00 € Referred to was on the other hand the notary that Mr Beernaert used "full amount" was referring to what the parties agreed (although that after the gathering of may 29, 2012 no single relevant dialog or negotiation between the parties had been).