Hoewel concluant aanvankelijk dacht dat deze nota van de hand van eiseres zelf was, lijkt stuk A van eiseres aan te tonen dat de nota op de voorafgaande bespreking van 26 maart 2012 werd opgesteld door de notaris.
Although concluant initially thought this note from the hand of the claimant himself was A plaintiff's piece, seems to show that the note on the prior discussion of 26 March 2012 has been prepared by the notary.
Although concluant initially thought that this note was written by the plaintiff himself, seems to part A of the plaintiff show that the note on the previous discussion on March 26, 2012 was prepared by the notary.
although concluant initially thought that this letter of the hand of the self, is a piece of the plaintiff to prove that the note on the preceding discussion of 26 march 2012 was drafted by the notary. "