Hoe kan verweerder dan nog stellen

Hoe kan verweerder dan nog stellen dat er géén opleg voorzien was?!...
In zijn stuk één brengt hij echter een héél eenzijdige en niet correcte berekening waaruit zou dienen te blijken dat één en ander ofwel betaald werd door hem ofwel gecompenseerd werd.
Concluante kan met stelligheid zeggen dat enkel de kwestieuze 20.500,00 € werd ontvangen alsook de 3.500,00 € voor het meubilair (meer bepaald op 30.09.2012)
Indien de 20.500,00 € als compensatie voor het gebouw op de Tiensevest zou gedaan zijn rest een saldo van 12.500,00 € wat dat item betreft.

結果 (英語) 1:

How can defendant still argue that there is no lay-on was?! ...In his piece, however, one he brings a very one-sided and not correct calculation which would serve to prove that one and other either paid by him either was compensated.Concluante can with certainty say that only questionable 20,500, 00 was received as well as the € 3,500.00 € for the furniture (more specifically on 30.09.2012)If the 20,500, 00 € as compensation for the building would be done on the Tiensevest rest a balance of € 12.500,00 for that item.

結果 (英語) 2:

The defendant can still argue that there is no overlay was provided?! ...
In his piece, however, he brings a very one-sided and incorrect calculation which would serve to prove that one and the other was either paid was offset by him either.
Concluante can say with certainty that only the disputed € 20,500.00 was received as well as € 3,500.00 for furniture (specifically on 30.09.2012)
If the € 20,500.00 in compensation would be done for the rest of the building Tiensevest a balance of € 12,500.00 for that item.

結果 (英語) 3:

How can the defendant still provide that no last minute was?! ...
In his piece, but one he brings a very one-sided and not correct calculation which would serve to show that one and other either paid by him or was compensated.
Concluante can say with certainty that only the disputed 20,500.00 € was received as well as the 3,500,