To date, no plaintiff filed a complaint because of falsehood, nor does the claimant shown that there is a forgery by the Act would crept.The plaintiff seeks in current procedure the existence of the note a sterile Act just ignore and claims against the content of this Act in that they would be entitled to on a weekend from Thursday afternoon up to 80,000 euros.The content of the Act is clearly nogthans zer and stipulates that neither party owes a lay-on.The plaintiff must therefore as manifesto of vorden unfounded to be rejected.
翻訳されて、しばらくお待ちください..
