Concluante begrijpt de redenering v

Concluante begrijpt de redenering van verweerder niet omtrent enige “valsheid” van de akte.
De akte is niet vals, integendeel, doch de opleg ontbreekt gewoon. Doch is het niet omdat die niet vermeld werd dat die niet overeengekomen werd, integendeel. Vandaar de berekening van de notaris, hetgeen het enige punt van overeenkomst blijkt omtrent de opleg. Zeker nu er na die bespreking geen verdere onderhandelingen meer gebeurden.

結果 (英語) 1:

Concluante understands the reasoning of defendant not about any "forgery" of the Act.The Act is not false, on the contrary, but the lay-on is missing. But it is not because not mentioned was that that was not agreed, quite the contrary. Hence the calculation of the notary, which is the only point of agreement about the lay-on. Especially now, after which no further negotiations more discussion happened.

結果 (英語) 2:

Concluante understands the reasoning of the defendant not only about "falsehood" of the deed.
The deed is not false, on the contrary, but the overlay simply missing. But it is not because it did not specify that that was not agreed contrary. Hence the calculation of the notary, which is the only point of agreement appears on the overlay. Especially now, after that discussion no further negotiations were happening more.

結果 (英語) 3:

Concluante understands the reasoning of the defendant not about only "forgery" of the act.
The act is not false, on the contrary, but the last minute simply missing. But it is not because it is not stated that that was not agreed, on the contrary. That is why the calculation of the notary public, which is the only point of agreement shows on the last minute.After that discussion now that no further negotiations took place more.