Uit de correspondentie met de notaris en die tevens werd doorverstuurd aan verweerder kan duidelijk blijken dat er inderdaad discussies zijn geweest en dat een opleg voorzien was.
From the correspondence with the notary and that doorverstuurd was also to prove that defendant may clearly discussions have been and that was a lay-on.
The correspondence with the notary and that was also sent by the defendant can prove clearly that there are indeed discussions have been and that a supporting anticipated.
From the correspondence with the notary public and that it was also doorverstuurd to the defendant can show that it is true that there have been discussions and that a last minute was foreseen.