Verweerd tracht wijs te maken dat e

Verweerd tracht wijs te maken dat er helemaal geen sprake was van een opleg laat staan dat daar enige discussie over was doch uit de stukken en in zijn handelingen blijkt duidelijk dat er wel degelijk een opleg voorzien was.
In stuk 9 stelt gedaagde dan ook heel duidelijk: “You are starting again about a share of yours of 80k. As we discussed two years ago, you took out the money you had invested in Noormannenstraat when it was sold, so I do not understand where this 80k is coming from. The fact that you are suggesting that my calculating was incorrect is not acceptable. We discussed over it for months and put in a notary deed just to avoid this kind of thing happening. Including the money you had from me I have refunded you nearly 35.000 euro”.

結果 (英語) 1:

Weathered tries to make point that there aren't any there was a lay-on let alone that there was some discussion about but it is clear from the documents before the Court and in his acts that there is a lay-on was.In very clear piece 9 sets defendant: "You are starting again about a share or yours or 80 k. As we discussed two years ago, you took out the money you had invested in Noormannen Street when it was sold, so I do not understand where this is coming from 80 k. The fact that you are suggesting that my calculating was incorrect is not acceptable. We discussed about it for months and put in a notary did just to avoid this kind of thing happening. Including the money you had from me I have refunded you nearly 35,000 euro ".

結果 (英語) 2:

Weathered wise trying to make was that there was no question of a support let alone that there was some debate but from the documents and in his actions clearly show that there was indeed an imposing air.
In chapter 9 sets defendant therefore quite clear "You are starting again about a share or yours or 80k. Axis we be discussed two years ago, you fired out the money you have invested in Norman Street When it was sold, so I do not understand where clause 80k this is coming from. The factthat you are Suggesting That My calculating was incorrect is not acceptable. We be discussed about it for months and put in a notary did just to avoid this child or thing happening. Including the money you had from me I have refunded you Nearly 35,000 euros. "

結果 (英語) 3:

Weathered seeks that there was no way of a last minute let alone that there was some discussion about but from the documents and in its actions it is clear that there is indeed a last minute feature was.
In piece 9, defendant very clear: "You ares starting again about a share or yours or 80k. As we discussed two years ago,You took out the money you had invested in Noormannenstraat when it was sold, so I do not understand where this 80k is coming from. The fact that you are suggesting that my "calculating image" shows was incorrect is not acceptable. We discussed about it for months and put in a notary did just to avoid this child or thing happening. Including the money you had from me I have refunded you nearly 35,000 euro".