Cruijff: “Zo worden talenten uitein

Cruijff: “Zo worden talenten uiteindelijk opgeblazen”


Johan Cruijff uit maandagochtend in zijn column in de Telegraaf stevige kritiek op het spel van Ajax. Volgens Cruijff draait alles om het in het vizier houden van de bal en daar schort het volgens hem juist aan: “Ik kijk met verbazing hoe vaak volwassen spelers in de Eredivisie met hun rug naar de bal staan of lopen.” Niet alleen de verdedigers maken zich hier volgens Cruijff aan schuldig, ook de aanvallers: “Te vaak zie ik Fischer, Milik en El Ghazi dertig meter teruglopen als de keeper van de tegenpartij de bal heeft, zonder dat ze naar de tegenstander of de bal kijken.”

Ook het ontbreken van tweebenigheid is een kritiekpunt van Cruijff: “Weinig aanvallers zijn in staat een bal tweebenig aan te nemen.” Hij gebruikt een recent voorbeeld om zijn commentaar te illustreren: “Neem het doelpunt van Cerny tegen Celtic. De pass die Milik op hem gaf was een drama. Het was dat Cerny een goed linkerbeen heeft, waarmee hij de bal kon meeslepen, anders was de counter mislukt.”

Maar het te weinig kijken naar de bal en het ontbreken van tweebenigheid zijn niet de enige kritiekpunten van Cruijff, ook vindt hij dat er te veel wordt gelopen. “Iemand die elf tot twaalf kilometer per wedstrijd loopt zou er bij mij altijd uitgehaald worden”, schrijft hij stellig. “Als de boel goed staat moet acht tot negen kilometer voldoende zijn, zeker als je met de kwaliteiten van Ajax in de Eredivisie speelt.” Ook neemt Cruijff het op voor Klaassen en Van de Beek, die in zijn ogen tegen zichzelf in bescherming moeten worden genomen. Omdat ze beiden zo veel zien, zouden ze vanuit hun verantwoordelijkheid naar het team meer lopen dan nodig is. Volgens Cruijff is dit de reden dat Klaassen al diverse blessures heeft gehad en hij wil voorkomen dat dat Van de Beek ook overkomt.

“Omdat anderen vergeten naar de bal te kijken of niet in staat zijn een bal goed in te spelen of aan te nemen, moeten types als Klaassen en Van de Beek te veel doen. Zo worden talenten uiteindelijk opgeblazen”, besluit Cruijff zijn uitingen van kritiek.

結果 (英語) 1:

Cruyff: "So be talents eventually bloated"Johan Cruyff from Monday morning in his column in the Telegraph strong criticism on the game of Ajax. According to Cruyff is all about keeping the ball in the visor and apron it according to him: "I look in amazement how often adult players in the Premier League with their backs to the ball standing or walking." Not only the defenders are here according to Cruyff to guilty, also the attackers: "too often I see Fischer, Milik and El Ghazi thirty meters is down as the keeper of the opposing team has the ball, without having to watch the opponent or the ball."Also the lack of tweebenigheid is a critical point of Cruijff: "few attackers are able to take a ball and left." He used a recent example to illustrate his comment: "take the goal of Cerny against Celtic. The pass that Milik on gave him was a drama. It was that Cerny has a good left leg, with which he the ball could be carried away, otherwise the counter failed. "But it too little look at the ball and the lack of tweebenigheid are not the only criticisms of Cruyff, also he finds that there is too much is run. "Someone who is eleven to twelve kilometres per game I would always be extracted runs", he writes certainly. "If things get good state should have eight to nine kilometres are sufficient, especially if you are with the qualities of Ajax in the Eredivisie plays." Cruyff also takes it on for Kadir and of the Brook, which in his view should be taken in protection against themselves. Because they both see as much, they would walk from their responsibility to the team more than necessary. According to Cruyff, this is the reason that Kabila has had several injuries and he wants to prevent that from happening to the Brook also."Because others forgot the ball to look or are unable to play or to a ball well in must be types as Kadir and Van to do much. So are talents eventually blown up, "concludes Cruyff are expressions of criticism.

結果 (英語) 2:

Cruyff: "So talents are eventually blown up" Johan Cruyff out Monday morning in his column in the Telegraph strong criticism of the game of Ajax. According to Cruyff is all about in the crosshairs hold of the ball and there apron according to him correctly: "I'm amazed how many adult players in the Eredivisie with their backs or run to the ball." Not only do the defenders here under Cruyff guilty, including the attackers: "Too often I see Fischer, Milik and El Ghazi walk back thirty meters as the goalkeeper of the opposing team has the ball, without having to look at the opponent and the ball." The absence of bipedalism is a critical point of Cruyff: "Few attackers are able to participate in a two-legged ball." He used a recent example to illustrate his comments: "Take Cerny's goal against Celtic. Pass through Milik gave him was a tragedy. It was that Cerny has a good left foot, which he could rush the ball, otherwise the counter failed. "But not enough to look at the ball and the lack of bipedalism are not the only criticisms of Cruyff, he also feels that there walked a lot. "Someone who is eleven to twelve kilometers per contest runs there would always be taken out at me," he says firmly. "If things correctly must be eight to nine kilometers suffice, especially if you play with the qualities of Ajax in the Eredivisie." Also Cruijff takes it up for Klaassen and Van de Beek, who should be in protecting his eyes from himself taken. Because they both see as much as they would from their responsibility to the team run more than necessary. According to Cruyff is this why Klaassen has had various injuries and he wants to prevent that Van de Beek also happens. "Because others forget to watch the ball or not able to have a ball to play well in or adopt, should types as Klaassen and Van de Beek to do much. So talents are eventually blown up, "Cruyff decision are expressions of criticism.

結果 (英語) 3:

cruyff: "so be talents eventually blown"

"johan cruijff from monday in his column in the telegraph strong criticism on the game of ajax. according to cruyff turns everything in sight of the ball and apron according to him: "i wonder how many adult players in the league with their backs to the ball walk."not only the defenders are under cruyff guilty, the attackers:" i often see fischer, milik and el ghazi 30 meters decrease as the keeper of the counterparty without the ball, the opponent or to see the ball. "
" the lack of tweebenigheid is a criticism of cruyff: "little attackers are able to take a ball two legged."he used a recent example to illustrate to comment:" take the goal of cerny against celtic. the pass milik gave him was a tragedy. it was a good cerny left leg, which he could carry the ball, or the counter failed. "

but not watching the ball and the lack of tweebenigheid are not the only criticisms of cruyff.he also finds that there is too much work. "someone who is 11 to 12 miles per game would always be played with me", he writes, certainly. "if the good state is eight to nine miles are sufficient, especially if you with the qualities of ajax in the premiership." take it for punch andjudy. they've cruyff and of the stream,in his eyes, should be taken to protect themselves. because they both so much, they would from their responsibility to the team more than is necessary. this is the reason that under cruyff punch andjudy. they've already had several injuries and he wants to prevent that from happening to the stream.

"because people forget to look at the ball or not be able to play a ball in or to take, and the stream of people like punch andjudy. they've too much. so be talents eventually blown "decision cruyff are manifestations of criticism."